Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

PRELIMINARY U.S. STATE SCREENING

Your expansion shortlist.
The evidence behind it.

Example Precision Manufacturing

advanced manufacturing

Simulated analysis timestamp: Sep 22, 2026
Report rendered: Sep 22, 2026

A decision-support report for narrowing state-level research and planning the local checks that follow.

Illustrative architecture only.

About this fully populated example

90 jobs | $24M investment | 120,000 sq. ft. | 18 acres | 5 MW peak electricity

Water: 25,000 gal/day. Wastewater: 18,000 gal/day. Target opening: October 1, 2027. All 90 positions are assigned to three occupation categories.

All nine planned screening indicators have illustrative observations: 76/76 weight points. Five additional categories beyond the earlier four-indicator example are illustrated; live availability is not established by this sample.

Example State A, B and C are fictional, not aliases for real U.S. states. Government links explain data categories and do not substantiate any invented value. Real reports may have unavailable fields, which must be stated honestly. No real data retrieval or local verification occurred.

All nine screening measures, populated

Every cell below is fictional. These data show the report format, not current BE data availability. Normalized scores are chosen examples rather than values derived from these observations or live government data.

Illustrative screening measure	Example A	Example B	Example C
Relevant occupation employment depth (employment-to-hiring ratio (example))	900	1,200	780
Relevant occupation median wage (USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage)	56,000	62,500	58,500
Industrial electricity price (cents/kWh; example state average)	8.6	10.2	9.4
Freight access (illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better)	82	90	76
Manufacturing employment (private manufacturing jobs (example))	310,000	440,000	270,000
Relevant graduate pipeline (relevant completions/year (example))	8,400	11,200	7,100
Natural hazard risk (illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better)	24	31	20
Broadband service coverage (percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold)	96.8	98.4	95.2
Real GDP per capita (chained 2017 USD/person (example))	68,500	73,800	65,200

Signals and their different meanings

Illustrative signal	Example A	Example B	Example C
Calculated fit /100	83.21	82.47	76.11
Calculated ranking signal /100	83.21	82.47	76.11
Filled sample screening weight	76/76 (100%)	76/76 (100%)	76/76 (100%)
Assigned example confidence /100	86	90	82
Assigned example readiness /100	68	72	66
Local requirement checks completed	0 of 6	0 of 6	0 of 6

Confidence and readiness values are assigned solely to demonstrate the fields; they are not calibrated probabilities or a completed engineering review. Fit is computed from the nine example scores and the standard plan. A 100% filled sample is not proof of complete production coverage.

Workforce inputs: all 90 planned positions

Occupation (fictional mix)	Positions	A wage USD/yr	B wage USD/yr	C wage USD/yr
Computer Numerically Controlled Tool Operators	40	45,000	51,000	46,500
Industrial Machinery Mechanics	30	53,000	59,500	56,500
Industrial Engineers	20	82,500	90,000	85,500

The headcount-weighted wage indicators are $56,000, $62,500 and $58,500. They are not wage offers or full payroll budgets. All amounts are fictional. Priorities are recorded; ranking still uses standard manufacturing weights.

Executive shortlist

#1 Example State A

OBSERVED FIT / 100

Observed fit, not probability of success

Ranking signal: 83
Planned screening coverage: 100%
Confidence: High (illustrative)
Model readiness: Screening only - local checks open

#2 Example State B

OBSERVED FIT / 100

Observed fit, not probability of success

Ranking signal: 82
Planned screening coverage: 100%
Confidence: High (illustrative)
Model readiness: Screening only - local checks open

#3 Example State C

OBSERVED FIT / 100

Observed fit, not probability of success

Ranking signal: 76
Planned screening coverage: 100%
Confidence: Moderate (illustrative)
Model readiness: Screening only - local checks open

What to take forward

Example State A leads within this saved model. Review the recorded advantages and trade-offs, then use the location action plan to request site-specific evidence. This is a preliminary shortlist, not approval of a named site.

Scope that stays attached to every result

Observed fit is conditional on the recorded evidence. It is not a probability of business success, a site recommendation or confirmation that a facility can operate in a location.

Only the confirmed occupations customize the labor calculation. Other weights use the standard manufacturing plan. Statistical readiness does not verify property, utility, hiring or permitting requirements. Payment does not remove these limitations.

EXPORT ENVIRONMENT NOT RECORDED. Source observations are retained as recorded; a test label describes the environment, not whether observations are fictional.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

01 / COMPARE THE SHORTLIST

The recorded evidence, side by side.

A comparison of the top saved candidates. Blank or missing observations are not treated as measured zero values.

Recorded measure	#1 Example State A	#2 Example State B	#3 Example State C
Workforce depth for selected occupations	900 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)	1,200 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)	780 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)
Weighted occupational wage	56,000 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage	62,500 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage	58,500 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage
Industrial electricity price	8.6 cents/kWh; example state average	10.2 cents/kWh; example state average	9.4 cents/kWh; example state average
Freight access	82 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better	90 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better	76 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better
Manufacturing employment	310,000 private manufacturing jobs (example)	440,000 private manufacturing jobs (example)	270,000 private manufacturing jobs (example)
Graduate pipeline	8,400 relevant completions/year (example)	11,200 relevant completions/year (example)	7,100 relevant completions/year (example)
Natural hazard risk	24 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better	31 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better	20 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better
Broadband coverage	96.8 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold	98.4 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold	95.2 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold
Real GDP per capita	68,500 chained 2017 USD/person (example)	73,800 chained 2017 USD/person (example)	65,200 chained 2017 USD/person (example)

Why Example State A leads within this model

The illustrative occupation-weighted wage is $56,000 versus $62,500 in B; electricity is 8.6 versus 10.2 cents/kWh.
A leads narrowly: 83.21 versus 82.47. Lower cost indicators offset B's stronger employment, freight and graduate pipeline.

Trade-offs recorded with this run

B's illustrative employment-to-hiring ratio is 1,200 versus A's 900. A's cost advantage is not proof that its recruitment plan is feasible.
A's 0.74-point lead is not a decisive margin. Recheck assumptions and actual local evidence before choosing a site.

Read the measures correctly

The wage measure is a headcount-weighted average of the selected occupational wage figures, not a single statewide median salary. Workforce depth is a transformed employment-per-requested-hire index, not a count of available applicants. Exact values, units and calculation notes remain in the appendix.

State-average electricity prices do not establish site tariffs or capacity. Manufacturing employment is not immediately recruitable labor.

Reference periods and retrieval dates are retained for each observation in the source appendix. This export does not refresh the underlying evidence.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

02 / UNDERSTAND THE MODEL

How to read the saved result.

OBSERVED FIT83

Fit across measured criteria

RANKING SIGNAL83

Fit adjusted for evidence coverage

PLANNED SCREENING COVERAGE100%

Not verification of a named site

Coverage uses the complete planned state-screening weight, including unavailable criteria. It does not measure site-level feasibility or verification of every project requirement.

Criteria included in the saved score breakdown

Illustrative normalized inputs use a 0-100 scale. Contribution = normalized input x criterion weight / 76. Displayed contributions are rounded; totals use full precision.

Criterion	Observed value	Weight points	Recorded contribution
Relevant occupation employment depth	900	18	18.95
Relevant occupation median wage	56000	12	13.89
Industrial electricity price	8.6	10	11.32
Freight access	82	10	11.05
Manufacturing employment	310000	8	8.21
Relevant graduate pipeline	8400	6	6.32
Natural hazard risk	24	6	6.63
Broadband service coverage	96.8	4	4.74
Real GDP per capita	68500	2	2.11

Weight points are not percentages.

The table preserves the model's recorded weights and contributions. Missing criteria remain in the full-plan coverage denominator where that method was recorded. A zero contribution for a missing observation is not a measured zero or poor performance. Scores are exported as saved, not recalculated here.

Model readiness: Screening only - local checks open. This is an assessment status, not an application or payment error. Confidence is High (illustrative).

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

03 / INCLUDED LOCATION GUIDANCE

Your next steps in Example State A

Project-specific confirmation plan

Use this included guidance when evaluating sites in Example State A. Turn saved requirements into specific questions for utilities, property contacts and local partners.

This is a confirmation plan, not a list of data failures.

These checks remain open until the responsible parties confirm conditions at a named site. Contact roles are suggestions, not assignments or evidence that a provider is engaged.

90 confirmed occupation positions out of 90 planned jobs are represented in the labor model.

Utilities & connections

Who to involve: Utility provider / local authority

Power: 5 MW peak; written tariff and connection termsRecorded status: open / Priority: critical

Utility liaison (example role); example deadline 2026-10-09. Capacity letter, network upgrades, connection date and tariff.

Evidence needed: Written site-specific capacity, connection timing, costs and service constraints.

Water: 25,000 gal/day; wastewater: 18,000 gal/dayRecorded status: open / Priority: critical

Process engineer (example role); example deadline 2026-10-16. Water-quality and discharge requirements plus written utility response.

Evidence needed: Written site-specific capacity, connection timing, costs and service constraints.

Verify 5 MW of electric capacity at each candidate siteRecorded status: unverified / Priority: critical

Obtain written utility confirmation of deliverable capacity, connection cost, lead time and redundancy; a statewide electricity rate does not verify capacity.

Evidence needed: Written site-specific capacity, connection timing, costs and service constraints.

Verify 25,000 gallons/day of water at each candidate siteRecorded status: unverified / Priority: critical

Confirm capacity, pressure, process-water quality, connection requirements and the date service can be provided.

Evidence needed: Written site-specific capacity, connection timing, costs and service constraints.

Verify 18,000 gallons/day of wastewater at each candidate siteRecorded status: unverified / Priority: critical

Confirm permitted discharge characteristics, pretreatment needs, capacity and connection timing with the receiving utility.

Evidence needed: Written site-specific capacity, connection timing, costs and service constraints.

Property & site

Who to involve: Property owner, broker or economic development organization (EDO)

Verify at least 120,000 sq. ft. of suitable facility spaceRecorded status: unverified / Priority: critical

Confirm usable area, permitted activity, building specifications, availability and fit-out needs for a named property.

Evidence needed: Current property documentation confirming availability, dimensions, permitted use and material constraints.

Verify at least 18 acres of suitable site areaRecorded status: unverified / Priority: critical

Confirm usable developable acreage, zoning, access, constraints and ownership or lease availability; state-level employment data cannot verify this.

Evidence needed: Current property documentation confirming availability, dimensions, permitted use and material constraints.

Workforce & hiring

Who to involve: Your team + Business Embassy + local workforce partners

Validate the hiring plan with local workforce evidenceRecorded status: unverified / Priority: high

Occupation employment is an existing employment base, not a count of available applicants. Verify skills, compensation, shifts, recruitment competition and the hiring timetable.

Evidence needed: A complete role/headcount plan and local recruitment evidence for the required hiring window.

Timing & priorities

Who to involve: Your team + Business Embassy + relevant local authorities

Operating date: October 1, 2027Recorded status: open / Priority: high

Project director (example role); example deadline 2026-10-30. Permits, property fit-out, equipment and utility critical-path schedule.

Evidence needed: A project schedule reconciled with property, utility, permitting and fit-out lead times.

Validate the requested operating date: 2027-10-01Recorded status: unverified / Priority: high

Check property availability, construction or fit-out, utility lead times and permits against the customer schedule. No completion date has been verified.

Evidence needed: A project schedule reconciled with property, utility, permitting and fit-out lead times.

Review the customer's decision prioritiesRecorded status: unverified / Priority: high

Recorded priorities: workforce, operating cost, logistics. Current ranking weights still follow the standard manufacturing plan; these preferences have not been converted into custom weights.

Evidence needed: Your confirmed decision priorities. Current screening weights remain unchanged.

Investment & incentives

Who to involve: Business Embassy + state/local EDO + incentive authority

Validate capital-spend assumptions and potential incentivesRecorded status: unverified / Priority: normal

The intake records USD 24,000,000 of investment. Verify the eligible expenditure and job-creation schedule; no incentive award or project economics has been confirmed.

Evidence needed: Written eligibility or offer documentation tied to the verified jobs, investment and schedule.

Other local checks

Who to involve: Business Embassy + responsible local verifier

120,000 sq. ft.; 18 developable acresRecorded status: open / Priority: critical

Property adviser (example role); example deadline 2026-10-16. Named property, usable dimensions, zoning, availability and survey.

Evidence needed: Primary project-specific evidence from the responsible verifier for the named candidate site.

90 hires: 40 operators, 30 mechanics, 20 engineersRecorded status: open / Priority: high

HR lead (example role); example deadline 2026-10-23. Recruitment-area review, compensation, shift pattern and hiring plan.

Evidence needed: Primary project-specific evidence from the responsible verifier for the named candidate site.

$24M investment; incentives assessed separatelyRecorded status: open / Priority: high

Finance lead (example role); example deadline 2026-10-30. Eligible expenditure schedule and written program eligibility review.

Evidence needed: Primary project-specific evidence from the responsible verifier for the named candidate site.

Discuss this plan with Business Embassy

Business Embassy can help clarify inputs and coordinate local evidence requests. Utility, property, hiring, timing and incentive conditions require primary confirmation. Additional service scope must be agreed separately; this plan does not order a service or verify a site.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

04 / SCOPE AND OPEN QUESTIONS

What the screening has not established.

Coverage uses the complete planned state-screening weight, including unavailable criteria. It does not measure site-level feasibility or verification of every project requirement.

Follow-up plan: owners, dates and requested proof

Example roles and deadlines are populated to show a usable action plan. These are not contracted BE assignments or verified supplier responses.

Requirement	Example owner / deadline	Evidence to obtain / status
Power: 5 MW peak; written tariff and connection terms	Utility liaison (example role) 2026-10-09	Capacity letter, network upgrades, connection date and tariff. Open - no capacity verified.
Water: 25,000 gal/day; wastewater: 18,000 gal/day	Process engineer (example role) 2026-10-16	Water-quality and discharge requirements plus written utility response. Open - no service verified.
120,000 sq. ft.; 18 developable acres	Property adviser (example role) 2026-10-16	Named property, usable dimensions, zoning, availability and survey. Open - no property verified.
90 hires: 40 operators, 30 mechanics, 20 engineers	HR lead (example role) 2026-10-23	Recruitment-area review, compensation, shift pattern and hiring plan. Open - recruitment not verified.
Operating date: October 1, 2027	Project director (example role) 2026-10-30	Permits, property fit-out, equipment and utility critical-path schedule. Open - schedule not verified.
$24M investment; incentives assessed separately	Finance lead (example role) 2026-10-30	Eligible expenditure schedule and written program eligibility review. Open - no incentive award.

Remaining screening / data uncertainty

5 MW electricity, 25,000 gal/day water and 18,000 gal/day wastewater still need written local confirmation.
A 120,000 sq. ft. facility on 18 usable acres and the October 1, 2027 opening date are requirements, not verified availability.
All 90 roles are represented by sample inputs; no actual applicants, negotiated wages or incentive awards have been verified.

Separate unavailable model evidence from local site checks.

The preceding location plan addresses named-site conditions. This section preserves unresolved screening questions. Neither a purchase nor a new document design resolves those questions.

Saved next-action record

2026-10-09: Utility liaison (example role) - Power: 5 MW peak; written tariff and connection terms. Obtain: Capacity letter, network upgrades, connection date and tariff.
2026-10-16: Process engineer (example role) - Water: 25,000 gal/day; wastewater: 18,000 gal/day. Obtain: Water-quality and discharge requirements plus written utility response.
2026-10-16: Property adviser (example role) - 120,000 sq. ft.; 18 developable acres. Obtain: Named property, usable dimensions, zoning, availability and survey.
2026-10-23: HR lead (example role) - 90 hires: 40 operators, 30 mechanics, 20 engineers. Obtain: Recruitment-area review, compensation, shift pattern and hiring plan.
2026-10-30: Project director (example role) - Operating date: October 1, 2027. Obtain: Permits, property fit-out, equipment and utility critical-path schedule.
2026-10-30: Finance lead (example role) - $24M investment; incentives assessed separately. Obtain: Eligible expenditure schedule and written program eligibility review.

This record is retained for completeness and may repeat checks explained in the location guidance. Technical source keys are retained in the audit trail.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

APPENDIX / SAVED ANALYSIS IDENTITY

The audit trail stays with the report.

Project	Example Precision Manufacturing
Saved analysis	2026-09-22 12:05 UTC (simulated)
Run	PUBLIC-SAMPLE-02
Scoring model	Full-detail fictional fixture v2 - not a live run
Report rendered	2026-09-22 (fixed fictional sample edition v2)
Presentation version	be-deliverables-v1
Export environment	EXPORT ENVIRONMENT NOT RECORDED

Source evidence and limitations

These are the observations saved with the top three recommendations. Reference periods and retrieval dates are different. Period-end dates may be storage conventions; read the preserved notes below. Source availability is not rechecked by printing this report.

Scope that stays attached to every result

Observed fit is conditional on the recorded evidence. It is not a probability of business success, a site recommendation or confirmation that a facility can operate in a location.

Original uncertainty record

5 MW electricity, 25,000 gal/day water and 18,000 gal/day wastewater still need written local confirmation.
A 120,000 sq. ft. facility on 18 usable acres and the October 1, 2027 opening date are requirements, not verified availability.
All 90 roles are represented by sample inputs; no actual applicants, negotiated wages or incentive awards have been verified.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

SOURCE APPENDIX / EXAMPLE STATE A

Example State A: saved evidence

1. Workforce depth for selected occupations

Metric: occupation_employment_depth

Exact saved value: 900 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style employment

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_employment_depth

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 92/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Existing employment is not a count of available applicants; recruitment feasibility remains unverified.

2. Weighted occupational wage

Metric: occupation_median_wage

Exact saved value: 56000 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style wages

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_median_wage

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 92/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. The illustrative wage indicator is headcount-weighted, not a full payroll quotation including benefits, overtime or hiring costs.

3. Industrial electricity price

Metric: industrial_electricity_price

Exact saved value: 8.6 cents/kWh; example state average

Source: FICTIONAL example / EIA-style industrial electricity

Statistical reference period: 2026-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/industrial_electricity_price

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 90/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. A state-average price does not verify the 5 MW connection or an applicable facility tariff.

4. Freight access

Metric: freight_access_index

Exact saved value: 82 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / BTS/FAF-style logistics

Statistical reference period: 2024-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/freight_access_index

https://www.bts.gov/faf

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 84/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen composite is not a published government score or a carrier quote.

5. Manufacturing employment

Metric: manufacturing_employment

Exact saved value: 310000 private manufacturing jobs (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / QCEW-style manufacturing

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/manufacturing_employment

https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 91/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Broad industry employment describes an ecosystem, not immediately available workers or a verified supplier list.

6. Graduate pipeline

Metric: graduate_pipeline

Exact saved value: 8400 relevant completions/year (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / IPEDS-style education

Statistical reference period: 2025-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/graduate_pipeline

https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 82/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. Completions are not a forecast of recruits available to this employer.

7. Natural hazard risk

Metric: natural_hazard_risk

Exact saved value: 24 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / FEMA-style hazard review

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/natural_hazard_risk

https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 85/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen index is not a published FEMA score, a probability of loss or a property assessment.

8. Broadband coverage

Metric: broadband_service_coverage

Exact saved value: 96.8 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold

Source: FICTIONAL example / FCC-style connectivity

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/broadband_service_coverage

https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 87/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. The example assumes 100/20 Mbps; site speed, provider, redundancy and installation remain unverified.

9. Real GDP per capita

Metric: real_gdp_per_capita

Exact saved value: 68500 chained 2017 USD/person (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / BEA-style economic context

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/real_gdp_per_capita

https://apps.bea.gov/api/signup/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 89/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative value, not a verified live response. Productivity is broad context and has only 2 of the 76 screening-weight points.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

SOURCE APPENDIX / EXAMPLE STATE B

Example State B: saved evidence

1. Workforce depth for selected occupations

Metric: occupation_employment_depth

Exact saved value: 1200 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style employment

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_employment_depth

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 91/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Existing employment is not a count of available applicants; recruitment feasibility remains unverified.

2. Weighted occupational wage

Metric: occupation_median_wage

Exact saved value: 62500 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style wages

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_median_wage

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 91/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. The illustrative wage indicator is headcount-weighted, not a full payroll quotation including benefits, overtime or hiring costs.

3. Industrial electricity price

Metric: industrial_electricity_price

Exact saved value: 10.2 cents/kWh; example state average

Source: FICTIONAL example / EIA-style industrial electricity

Statistical reference period: 2026-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/industrial_electricity_price

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 89/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. A state-average price does not verify the 5 MW connection or an applicable facility tariff.

4. Freight access

Metric: freight_access_index

Exact saved value: 90 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / BTS/FAF-style logistics

Statistical reference period: 2024-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/freight_access_index

https://www.bts.gov/faf

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 83/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen composite is not a published government score or a carrier quote.

5. Manufacturing employment

Metric: manufacturing_employment

Exact saved value: 440000 private manufacturing jobs (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / QCEW-style manufacturing

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/manufacturing_employment

https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 90/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Broad industry employment describes an ecosystem, not immediately available workers or a verified supplier list.

6. Graduate pipeline

Metric: graduate_pipeline

Exact saved value: 11200 relevant completions/year (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / IPEDS-style education

Statistical reference period: 2025-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/graduate_pipeline

https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 81/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. Completions are not a forecast of recruits available to this employer.

7. Natural hazard risk

Metric: natural_hazard_risk

Exact saved value: 31 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / FEMA-style hazard review

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/natural_hazard_risk

https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 84/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen index is not a published FEMA score, a probability of loss or a property assessment.

8. Broadband coverage

Metric: broadband_service_coverage

Exact saved value: 98.4 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold

Source: FICTIONAL example / FCC-style connectivity

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/broadband_service_coverage

https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 86/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. The example assumes 100/20 Mbps; site speed, provider, redundancy and installation remain unverified.

9. Real GDP per capita

Metric: real_gdp_per_capita

Exact saved value: 73800 chained 2017 USD/person (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / BEA-style economic context

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/real_gdp_per_capita

https://apps.bea.gov/api/signup/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 88/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative value, not a verified live response. Productivity is broad context and has only 2 of the 76 screening-weight points.

Example Precision Manufacturing / SAVED SCREENING

SOURCE APPENDIX / EXAMPLE STATE C

Example State C: saved evidence

1. Workforce depth for selected occupations

Metric: occupation_employment_depth

Exact saved value: 780 employment-to-hiring ratio (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style employment

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_employment_depth

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 90/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Existing employment is not a count of available applicants; recruitment feasibility remains unverified.

2. Weighted occupational wage

Metric: occupation_median_wage

Exact saved value: 58500 USD/year; occupation-weighted median wage

Source: FICTIONAL example / OEWS-style wages

Statistical reference period: 2025-05-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/occupation_median_wage

https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 90/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. The illustrative wage indicator is headcount-weighted, not a full payroll quotation including benefits, overtime or hiring costs.

3. Industrial electricity price

Metric: industrial_electricity_price

Exact saved value: 9.4 cents/kWh; example state average

Source: FICTIONAL example / EIA-style industrial electricity

Statistical reference period: 2026-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/industrial_electricity_price

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 88/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. A state-average price does not verify the 5 MW connection or an applicable facility tariff.

4. Freight access

Metric: freight_access_index

Exact saved value: 76 illustrative access index, 0-100; higher is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / BTS/FAF-style logistics

Statistical reference period: 2024-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/freight_access_index

https://www.bts.gov/faf

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 82/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen composite is not a published government score or a carrier quote.

5. Manufacturing employment

Metric: manufacturing_employment

Exact saved value: 270000 private manufacturing jobs (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / QCEW-style manufacturing

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/manufacturing_employment

https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 89/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Broad industry employment describes an ecosystem, not immediately available workers or a verified supplier list.

6. Graduate pipeline

Metric: graduate_pipeline

Exact saved value: 7100 relevant completions/year (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / IPEDS-style education

Statistical reference period: 2025-06-30 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/graduate_pipeline

https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 80/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. Completions are not a forecast of recruits available to this employer.

7. Natural hazard risk

Metric: natural_hazard_risk

Exact saved value: 20 illustrative regional risk index, 0-100; lower is better

Source: FICTIONAL example / FEMA-style hazard review

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/natural_hazard_risk

https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 83/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. This chosen index is not a published FEMA score, a probability of loss or a property assessment.

8. Broadband coverage

Metric: broadband_service_coverage

Exact saved value: 95.2 percent of example locations meeting the assumed service threshold

Source: FICTIONAL example / FCC-style connectivity

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/broadband_service_coverage

https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 85/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative extension, not a verified live BE integration. The example assumes 100/20 Mbps; site speed, provider, redundancy and installation remain unverified.

9. Real GDP per capita

Metric: real_gdp_per_capita

Exact saved value: 65200 chained 2017 USD/person (example)

Source: FICTIONAL example / BEA-style economic context

Statistical reference period: 2025-12-31 (illustrative period)

Retrieved: 2026-09-22 12:00 UTC (simulated; no source request)

Recorded freshness flag: Example flag: within assumed age limit; not actually checked

Source methodology: full-detail-fixture-v2/real_gdp_per_capita

https://apps.bea.gov/api/signup/

FICTIONAL VALUE. This reference is not the source of this number. The dates and quality score are also simulated. Example quality: 87/100; not a provider-quality evaluation. Illustrative value, not a verified live response. Productivity is broad context and has only 2 of the 76 screening-weight points.